Several years ago, a study was released on the deterent effects of the death penalty. We all know it certainly deters one carreer criminal from doing another crime, but this was about the effects on the general population. The study had been comissioned by the death penalty information center, and its conclusion was that the death penalty did indeed deter criminals.
Now, we are back to square zero. The criminal enablers have been hard at it finding ways to pole holes in their study that showed they were wrong. So we are again faced with scumbag enablers who are attempting to force legislation to repeal death penalty laws.
Yes, I'm pissed. If our supreme court justices had the spine of an earth worm, they would rule that long term incarceration is far more cruel and inhumane then an air dance, or even the rack. They would strike down appeals based on all this challenging what is is. All convicts should be allowed one appeal on proceedural grounds or constitutionality issues, One shot for any of it, then any other appeal would be soley on evidence that might exonerate a convicted or condemned person. I would stop the bull shit as well, any attorney who trumped up an appeal with false facts would be barred from ever, EVER receiving money from public funds, so no free cash, hell, I'd say just disbar them and let a new legal beagle at the blood.
Appeals at tax payer expense should be limited as well. Its these crazy appeals that drive up the cost of executions, not the cost of feeding htem clothing them or anything else, the cost of feeding useless liars err lawyers. Cut the hogs off from the trough.
U.S. House passes measure to ban contracts with Venezuela
41 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment