Saturday, March 23, 2013

Why the Surpeme Court is wrong

The Supreme injustices of the court have screwed up many a time. We could go back to some of their first rulings and find fault. Some times they get it right, but when they get it wrong, they are stubborn and bone headed and will not admit it. Such is the case with executions of persons who commit vile acts before they turn 18. For some strange reason the band of fools has decided that kids should be spared the correct penalty for their heinous crimes because of age.
I'm not in favor of age descrimination, especially when something like this happens. These two killers are 17 and 14. likely they are brothers, but that is immaterial. They shot a woman simply because she had no money, then executed her baby.
I pray that there will be justice in prison for these two. That some one in the penetentary will have enough morals to shank these assholes.
The penalty for something like this should be not less then death by hanging. If you are old enough to contemplate this, and carry it out, you are old enough to be executed.
Turn coat Kennedy and his cohorts, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer are all accessories in this heinous crime. They should be in prison after this.

1 comment:

Spartacus said...

I see the intended point. But I want to counter it with perhaps it's not entirely the kids fault. In 99.99999% of these cases the kid was brought up by baby mom, baby dad split 5 minutes after he blew his wad. Save the death penalty for the irresponsible parents that created the little bastard. Baby mom knows when her time in her cycle is due, all she has to do is say no and explain why. That should be enough to make baby dad go limp. Parental obligations last 18 years, if you pulled your pants down and think it's over and run away form responsibilities the law should be able to charge you for being an irresponsible parent and culpable for the actions of the kid you made and failed to raise to be a responsible citizen. Just my opinion.