Sunday, January 31, 2010

Stimuless created or saved 7,200 jobs in Colorado

Or so trumps the headlines. When you read the article though it is clear that they are huffing and puffing about keeping government people on the pay roll.
Some of the jobs mentioned are in higher education and state prisons. Can we get a clarification? Who exactly got retained? I don't want names, job types or titles would be nice. If we are talking about excess pork positions, let them go! Government is bloated. We all know that. Often times articles like this are so vague, and they target it this way " jobs in state prisons" to earn sympathy for the pogram from the public. To be certain, prison guards are one state job that is a necessity. We don't need convicts escaping because guards were laid off as kalifornication threatened to do during their budget crisis.
Is this all smoke and mirrors? The gov should cut entitlements first. Start with foreign aid. Sure, Egypt will get mad if we sever their tit, but we need to keep or navy working. I'd hate to see a Carrier Air Wing on unemployment when there are terrorist breeding grounds needing flattened.
Next up, programs that fund stuff the general public would not fund if offered the choice. Yep, I man the National Endowment for failed Art and others. Next up, start to scale back welfare payments. If a welfare queen gets knocked up, require DNA testing and make the hobo daddy pay fr the kids.
We have a DNA data base for criminals, make one for welfare recipients and their sperm donors. They steal as much from us as any other kind of crook. What we really need is a birth control device for men. A norplant type item that can be inserted and would dispense medication rendering the sperm donor impotent. Make it mandatory for any man who fathers a child that is raised on the public dime.
Last, quite feeding us BULLSHIT about saved jobs when unemployment is over 10%. We know its crap! maybe all you are wanting to do is feed it to the liberal elite in hteir ivory towers? Some day they will pout, " How could those tea baggers revolt when every thing was going so good?"

No comments: