A no win situation for the democrats?

Since this whole impeachment fiasco began, most conservatives have been openly mocking the farce including me. In the view of many people this is a mockery that will turn voters against the democrat hopefuls and the donks in swing districts. It may even put traditionally safe districts in play as what happened in Massachusetts in the run up to Obamacare. That could see the democrat party swept from Congress for ten or even twenty years, and their globalist plans thwarted for a century.
Is it possible that this is a win win for the democrats? It occurred to me that many republicans in Washington are growing weary of the constant fighting. We know there will be one faithless deserter, Mittens will in all likelihood vote with the communists . We now know we dodged a bullet when Barry got reelected. Mitt would have shit on us big time. What happens if enough RINO's vote to remove OUR President? There would be a voter revolt at the polls. the Democrats would secure a strong majority in the Senate and likely hang on to the House. It would not matter if we had a republican President at that point, they would craft rule changes and make the executive irrelevant. After that, they would use fraud and voter intimidation to remain in power. Don't bet it couldn't happen, The swamp critters are owned and they know it.
But what if Cocaine Mitch manages to whip the base and the President is acquitted? Our nation is now more divided than at any point since the Civil War. If you think about it, that war did not happen because of Lincoln. He was not yet President when the Confederate states ceded. No executive order had been given, no presidential decree, no legislation signed or even submitted. In all his speeches he said his task was first and foremost to preserve the union. Had the south not rebelled, slavery would have lingered on for many years. it might be here today. Scary  thought.
No, what set the south aflame was democrat agitation in the form of a free press who felt they were free to lie, slander, and inflame the anger of their readers. What else could it be? None of them rode from Birmingham to Springfield to hear one of Lincoln's speeches. The northern press treated him no better. At the height of the Civil War , after the battle of Gettysburg, they mocked his address. That it became so famous was not because of the reporters of his day. In the 1850's most people had a poor education and reading skills were weak at best for many. They counted on reliable people to tell them the news. In some cases, a town crier would read the national news  in the town square. There was no radio, no television, no internet.
The press has not improved. President Reagan, and now President Trump are regularly mocked and lied about in all the forms of media. Does anyone believe the President will get fair treatment in this, the most crucial to date event in his Presidency? I have no faith in the media at all. When Sekulow or Cipollone speak, they might very well be muted and some commietator give analysis of their presentation rather than report the words they utter.
We. Know. Not. To. believe. A. Word. Of. It.
Unfortunately, the average liberal voter will buy it all. What happens if the media lie but the Senate acquits? Outrage.
Lets face facts. the dems have wanted a civil war for the past twelve years. Every act they performed under Barry was in your face. They wanted us to rise up and revolt. When people marched on Washington but did not riot, they were mad and disappointed. Did anyone call them racist names when they strolled through the crowd? They claimed it happened,yet video of the entire incident cannot find on utterance of a disparaging word. The dems want to transform this country into a communist utopia. Forget reeducation camps, they want you dead. Think South Africa and what is happening there now. If they shoot you, they can gift your possessions to some inner city poor person who has never had a good job, knows nothing about what you did or how. Also think about Russia. Stalin himself upped the ante when he signed a decree that made families liable for the crimes committed by their husband or father. Children aged 12 could also be executed under this decree. Basically no one was safe. 
Would they do it here? Why wouldn't they?
Yes, I believe they want you dead rather than reeducated. That is the history of communism, and these people are communists. Socialist is just a moniker, like progressive or liberal. Whether you review the history of Russia, China, Vietnam, Venezuela, or any other country where communism has been implemented. the story is the same.
We have already heard  one of the top Berniebots proclaim how they want to start internment camps if they win, and civil war if they lose. That he still has a job says much. That no other democrat candidate has called him out speaks volumes.
They want war, and they want you and me dead. There is not other solution in their plan. There never was. They intend to push one side or the other to start shooting so they can call in the U.N.
As it was in 1858, we are already in a civil war. We just have not had our Ft Sumner yet.