Which is better?

Purchasing or Leasing?

Which is better?

Many people cannot decide which is cheaper - purchasing or leasing. I would like to help you decide by illustrating two charming stories.

Purchasing

The math on the Paul McCartney - Heather Mills divorce was as follows:
After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million.
Assuming he had sex with her every night during their 5 year relationship, it ended up with him purchasing her @ $26,849 per time.

Leasing

On the other hand, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's favorite hooker, Kristen, charged $4,000 per night.

So, had Paul McCartney "employed" Kristen for 5 years @ $4,000 per night, he would have paid only $7.3 million in total for sex every night. This represents a $41.7 million saving for Eliot. What a shrewd man Eliot is, compared to the ageing Beatle.
Further valuable benefits of this Leasing option are;
* a (real) 22 year old
* no need for coaxing / pleading / begging
* never a headache
* happily agrees to all technical requests
* no complaining
* no “Honey - please do this” lists
* has two legs
Best of all, she leaves and returns when asked.
All at 1/7th the cost and no legal fees.

Sometimes Leasing just makes more sense.

THE OLD ADAGE STILL HOLDS TRUE...IF IT FLYS, FUCKS, OR FLOATS...RENT IT !