Tell me Liz Goodwin is a balanced reporter. Tell me she is not pushing an agenda. Go on, lie to me.
The supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on the Voter Rights Act today. Most of this has to do with whether the sixteen states covered by the Voter rights act can implement voter ID laws like states who are not covered.
"If Roberts and at least four other justices decide to strike down the part of
the law that singles out the southern states, civil rights advocates will have
few places to go in challenging voter ID laws." Liz wrote. Civil rights advocates? Gimme a break! People who want to turn their back on blatant voter fraud are not advocating for civil rights, they are advocating thug rule where in Holders goons can manipulate the vote with impunity despite our best efforts to stop fraud.
The bottom line is tha section 5 needs to go away. If discrimination rears is ugly head, the courts can always step in and stomp it. We know racial bias is not dead. We also know that the black demographic has the worst racism of any group, and the most problems. All one needs t odo is look at the crime stats for Chicago to see the disparity there where 90% of murders are black on black crime, and the number of cross racial crimes is strongly laced with black against other crime rather then blacks being the victims of minorities.
I got in an argument with a neighbor yesterday. I felt we should go back to sticking criminals in the military, send them through boot camp, them air drop them into Afghanistan or Mali. He doesn't want the skills the military teaches brough back to the streets of Chicago or LA. I never said we would let them back. Did I?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Your idea isn't bad. But I like the idea of a Judge Dredd like I saw in a Stalone movie. sort of.
Well, we could save money on parachutes.
Well, we could save money on parachutes.
Post a Comment